Sunday, January 14, 2007

2006 CGVRs

Sorry this took so long to get to you loyal readers (reader?). I'm not proficient enough in HTML to make a big table for this, but maybe in the future, it will look better. Anyway, here are the qualifying CGVRs for 2006.

+4 or more:
Wake Forest +5 (11-3)
Maryland +5 (9-4)
Auburn +5 (11-2)
Florida +5 (13-1)
Oregon State +4 (10-4)
Rice +4 (7-6)
Boise State +4 (13-0)
Iowa State +4 (4-8)
Arkansas State +4 (6-6)

+3:
Kansas State +3 (7-6)
Texas Tech +3 (8-5)
Wisconsin +3 (12-1)
Notre Dame +3 (10-3)
Ohio +3 (9-5)
Troy +3 (8-5)

+2:

Boston College +2 (10-3)
Texas A&M +2 (9-4)
LSU +2 (11-2)
Tennessee +2 (9-4)
Georgia +2 (9-4)
Kentucky +2 (8-5)
Ohio State +2 (12-1)
Purdue +2 (8-6)
Rutgers +2 (11-2)
Cincinnati +2 (8-5)
Southern Miss +2 (9-5)
Idaho +2 (4-8)
Louisiana-Lafayette +2 (6-6)

-4 or more:
North Carolina State -5 (3-9)
Memphis -5 (2-10)
Eastern Michigan -5 (1-11)
Florida International -5 (0-12)
Louisiana-Monroe -5 (4-8)
New Mexico State -4 (4-8)
Colorado -4 (2-10)

-3:
Duke -3 (0-12)
Missouri -3 (8-5)
Oklahoma State -3 (7-6)
Vanderbilt -3 (4-8)
Michigan State -3 (4-8)
Illinois -3 (2-10)
Air Force -3 (4-8)
Alabama-Birmingham -3 (3-9)
Miami (OH) -3 (2-10)

-2:
Clemson -2 (8-5)
Florida State -2 (7-6)
Alabama -2 (6-7)
Mississippi State -2 (3-9)
Iowa -2 (6-7)
Minnesota -2 (6-7)
San Diego State -2 (3-9)
UNLV -2 (2-10)
Houston -2 (10-4)
Nevada -2 (8-5)
North Texas -2 (2-10)

Expect the teams listed with positive CGVRs to be unable to improve on their 2006 records, while teams listed with negative CGVRs to be able to improve on theirs.

1 comment:

matt said...

Nice work. The CGVR stat is a very good tool for looking at which teams will improve or decline. ave you ever heard of or used the Pythagorean Theorem to evaluate performance in sports? Over at my blog, I'm working on a new stat called standard deviation power index to evaluate which teams could improve substantially next season.